Abstract
International Journal of Advance Research in Multidisciplinary, 2024;2(2):22-25
Case study of the chief justice of the Indonesian constitutional court controversy in dynasty politics
Author : Muhammad Bintang and Suryo Ediyono
Abstract
According to the ruling of the Constitutional Court, regional heads under 40 are eligible to run for president or vice president as long as they have served as regional heads or are currently serving them and have considered the advantages and disadvantages of doing so. 21 reports of alleged Code of Ethics violations were submitted to the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court (MKMK) following the ruling. MKMK conducted an examination session that ultimately produced results for the delegates. One of the results concerned the accused Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court, Anwar Usman, and the alleged breach of the code of ethics and behavior of constitutional judges against him, which had been reported by Denny Indrayana and associates. Analyzing the effect of this dispute on Indonesian democracy is the goal of this study. Through normative law, or normative juridical law, is the research methodology. analytically and descriptively described in order to explain a state or circumstance that is occurring. The public believes that Gibran Rakabuming will have more options to run for vice president in the 2024 elections as a result of this decision. In the end, setting the age restrictions for presidential and vice presidential candidates must be equitable and take into consideration the needs and aspirations of the community.
Keywords
Dynasty politics, rule of law, constitutional court, elections