Peer Review Process/Policy
The journal follows a rigorous double-blind peer review process, ensuring that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous during the evaluation.
Upon submission, each proposal undergoes an initial review by at least one editor. If the paper aligns with editorial standards and meets a minimum quality threshold, it advances to two reviewers. The reviewers are kept unaware of the author's identity, as any identifying information is redacted before the review.
Comments provided by reviewers to the editors are treated confidentially and are anonymized before being shared with the author. The final decision on manuscript acceptability is made by the Editorial Board based on reviewers' feedback. Authors are then notified of the decision along with referees' reports. If significant revisions are suggested, acceptance depends on the author addressing these revisions satisfactorily.
