INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCE RESEARCH
IN MULTIDISCIPLINARY

This paper explores the paradoxical power of Christianity as a resistance ideology in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment and Mikhail Bulgakov’s The Master and Margarita. Rejecting the commonplace notion that subversive Russian literature must be secular or anti-religious, I argue that both Dostoevsky and Bulgakov deploy religious frameworks to contest the ideological absolutism of their respective eras. Dostoevsky, writing amid the intellectual ferment of nineteenth-century Russia, responds to the encroachment of Western rationalism by reasserting the communal, redemptive virtues of Orthodox Christianity. His vision of pity and compassion stands as an explicit rejoinder to Kantian morality and Nietzschean critique. Bulgakov, confronting the desolate materialism and surveillance of Stalinist Moscow, turns to the carnivalesque and mystical, summoning the figure of Christ, alongside the Devil, to expose the spiritual barrenness of Soviet positivism. Through close comparative reading and engagement with leading scholarship, this study demonstrates how both authors reframe religion as a vital mode of intellectual and existential dissent. Ultimately, the novels under consideration reveal that Russia’s most profound critiques of authority and conformity often arise not because Russia was steeped in religious and spiritual worlds. Instead it emerged through that very theological and epistemological paradigm that classical scholars view with suspicion, reminding us of literature’s enduring capacity to unsettle, interrogate, and renew.